It Wasn't Just Toilets That Disappeared
Previously, I somewhat jokingly wondered what happened to the thousands of toilets from the WTC.
But really, it isn't just the toilets.
Think of all of the large bulky items that must have been in the towers-- there must have been tens of thousands of chairs and desks and computers in each tower, not to mention thousands of bookcases, filing cabinets, interior walls, cubicle walls, office doors, elevator doors.
Sure, a lot of this would be smashed by the weight of the tower structural elements, and it is of course hard to know exactly what was found in the rubble.
Nonetheless, given what we know about the WTC debris pile, it is hard not to get the sense that a lot of this inner office material simply disintegrated or disappeared.
Of course, besides the people and office contents that disappeared, there were the huge concrete slabs on each floor that were rendered into powder, and a significant amount of structural steel that remains unaccounted for.
The only thing that can account for all these phenomena, in the tremendous scale and very short time frames that were seen, is nuclear explosions-- most likely small clean (i.e. fission-less) fusion nuclear bombs.
A hydrogen bomb test blast (Storax sedan):
For the skeptics (and disinfo agents/shills/brainwashed dupes)-- yes, there was a great deal of potential energy built up in the WTC towers. But the simple fact is in any REAL "collapse", all of this potential energy would be used up by breaking apart the steel structure holding up the towers-- and there simply wouldn't be enough left to pulverize all of the concrete and building contents and turn them into powder.
Remember, a tower is stronger at the bottom and gets weaker and lighter as you go up. It simply is not the case that the top of the towers were precariously suspended on a fragile latticework of toothpicks waiting for something to cause the weight of the top to crush down through the lower structure!
To make the towers go POOF the way they did, you need to add in a LOT of energy-- such as can be derived from nuclear bombs.
But really, it isn't just the toilets.
Think of all of the large bulky items that must have been in the towers-- there must have been tens of thousands of chairs and desks and computers in each tower, not to mention thousands of bookcases, filing cabinets, interior walls, cubicle walls, office doors, elevator doors.
Sure, a lot of this would be smashed by the weight of the tower structural elements, and it is of course hard to know exactly what was found in the rubble.
Nonetheless, given what we know about the WTC debris pile, it is hard not to get the sense that a lot of this inner office material simply disintegrated or disappeared.
Of course, besides the people and office contents that disappeared, there were the huge concrete slabs on each floor that were rendered into powder, and a significant amount of structural steel that remains unaccounted for.
The only thing that can account for all these phenomena, in the tremendous scale and very short time frames that were seen, is nuclear explosions-- most likely small clean (i.e. fission-less) fusion nuclear bombs.
A hydrogen bomb test blast (Storax sedan):
For the skeptics (and disinfo agents/shills/brainwashed dupes)-- yes, there was a great deal of potential energy built up in the WTC towers. But the simple fact is in any REAL "collapse", all of this potential energy would be used up by breaking apart the steel structure holding up the towers-- and there simply wouldn't be enough left to pulverize all of the concrete and building contents and turn them into powder.
Remember, a tower is stronger at the bottom and gets weaker and lighter as you go up. It simply is not the case that the top of the towers were precariously suspended on a fragile latticework of toothpicks waiting for something to cause the weight of the top to crush down through the lower structure!
To make the towers go POOF the way they did, you need to add in a LOT of energy-- such as can be derived from nuclear bombs.
posted by spooked at 11:51 AM
8 Comments:
What happened to your Ray Gun From Outer Space theory?
can't rule out the ray gun from outer space theory.
can, however, rule out NIST's gravity driven bacon and eggs theory or whatever it's called.
"would you like fries with that?"
good old NIST!
Good question. Spooky has more theories about this thing than Carter has liver pills.
I'm not sure HE know what's going on.
Finding the theory that best explains the data/evidence is what scientists do.
I think small fusion nukes explain the data better than a beam weapon, currently.
"Finding the theory" is what internet morons pretend to do. Proving it is what scientists do, you idiot.
12:53 "anonymous" said:
"Spooky has more theories about this thing than Carter has liver pills."
"12:53 "anonymous" is either a paid shill or else is one of those very frightened fools who fear what they don't know and is deeply insecure about the little that they DO know.
"Finding the theory" is what internet morons pretend to do. Proving it is what scientists do, you idiot.
In a forensic situation such as with the WTC, there is no way to do experiments to recreate the happening exactly. So it is difficult to prove any theory.
It is worth noting, NIST has in no way shape or form PROVEN their (bullshit) theory for what happened to the towers.
Pretty effective info, thanks for the post.
Post a Comment
<< Home