Humint Events Online: What Hit the WTC North Tower on 9/11?

Monday, January 23, 2006

What Hit the WTC North Tower on 9/11?

An excellent analysis is here. Whatever hit the WTC North tower, it sure doesn't look like a Boeing 767, i.e. Flight 11.

Moreover, I defy anyone to explain the impact sequence (link to video), in terms of:
a) where the flying object enters the building and where the final hole appears
b) the pattern of the explosion and the shadows that appear on the building and how they fit with a 767 impact
c) what the large "flash" is that occurs as the flying object meets the building.

"Missilegate" has a frame by frame break-down of the entire sequence.

Does this look like a large plane about to hit the WTC?


The bottom line is that there is no evidence that flight 11 hit the WTC north tower on 9/11, and the official story is a lie.

P.S. The entire Naudet clip of the first hit can be seen here as a flash movie, or here from CNN, if you'd like a mainstream source. A commentator on a message board makes this interesting point:
One of the things I noticed about the Naudet video was the casualness of the fireman as he glanced up at the incoming object. I lived Queens and worked in New York City (Manhattan) for over 25 years. Low flying planes were common in Queens, as I lived between JFK and LaGuardia airports. Planes coming in and out of these two airports fly the same patterns over and over. .... Low flying aircraft in Manhattan is another story. For obvious reasons, none of the flight paths come anywhere near Manhattan. The only aircraft you see over Manhattan are helicopters. They belong to the police or the TV stations that do traffic reports. A low flying 767 flying below 1000 feet directly over Manhattan is something I never saw in 25 years as no other New yorker has either. Yet, this fireman, a person who you would think was trained to recognize dangerous situations, casually looks up and glances away at a site that never took place in his lifetime. .... only reasons I can think of as to why the fireman didn't react, was that it was a small craft and it wasn't making the deafening noise that usually comes from the 767's. Even watching the video I am not struck by the noise. It didn't appear to his reaction that what he was seeing was out of place. I know if were me and a 767 came in that low over Manhattan, I'd be running for cover. I know it is possible to subject the audio portion of the video to analysis which should quickly prove whether it was a 767 or something a lot smaller.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Since the camera cuts away from the fireman as the plane passed overhead, it's simply not possible to tell what he did after the flyover. Sorry. Also, the engine noise heard as the plane flies overhead sounds too loud to be a single rocket motor.

2:57 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger