9/11: Light Conspiracy versus Heavy Conspiracy
Light Conspiracy: US intelligence agents knew Al Qaeda was going to strike on 9/11, was following the hijackers but "let it happen" to further the US geopolitical agenda. Not too hard to believe for many people. There is some evidence for it.
Heavy Conspiracy: The hijackers weren't really flying the 9/11 planes-- the planes were either controlled by remote control or there was a plane swap with remote controlled drones. A much more involved plan, and on the face of it, hard to believe. But actually, the evidence is fairly strong for this sort of conspiracy.
The key to the heavy versus light conspiracy is in the answer to this question: WERE THE HIJACKERS CAPABALE OF FLYING THE 9/11 PLANES?
In my next post, I will go over the reasons why it is unlikely they were flying the planes.
Heavy Conspiracy: The hijackers weren't really flying the 9/11 planes-- the planes were either controlled by remote control or there was a plane swap with remote controlled drones. A much more involved plan, and on the face of it, hard to believe. But actually, the evidence is fairly strong for this sort of conspiracy.
The key to the heavy versus light conspiracy is in the answer to this question: WERE THE HIJACKERS CAPABALE OF FLYING THE 9/11 PLANES?
In my next post, I will go over the reasons why it is unlikely they were flying the planes.
posted by spooked at 6:43 PM
2 Comments:
Popular Mechanics, of all magazines, did an article debunking all the myths, what you call facts, concerning the 9/11 attacks. The open mind will at least read it, if for no other reason than to see the weaknesses of its own position--the better to improve it.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=1
Thanks for the comment. I did the read the Popular Mechanics article. Unfortunately they did not address the issue of whether the hijackers could really fly the planes.
I should also point out that 911 Review has a nice piece rebutted the PM article. The PM piece is flawed, biased and narrow in scope.
Post a Comment
<< Home